The Chinese Are Coming
In recent months many people have expressed concern about the
growing influence of Red China in the U.S. Red China is increasingly energized
economically and continues to expand its military. Former White House aide
George Stephanopoulos said March 16, 1997 on ABC This Week the administration
support of China "reflected the influence of the Council on Foreign
Relations(CFR)." Red China has always been part of the New World Order although
at a more peripherial level. As the New York Times said in February, 1972 in
conjunction with Nixon's opening to Red China, Nixon was "merely reiterating the
belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and
building a new world order."
China is building a large facility including an ammunition plant
in Adelanto, California to distribute its products with 1,000 Chinese workers
expected to move in. There are plans to build similar facilities in Charleston,
Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana. U.S. tax
payers are subsidizing a $138 million loan guarantee to build ships for the
China Ocean Shipping Co.(COSCO) in Alabama. This company is controlled by the
Chinese military. In addition, Panama recently agreed to lease the port on each
end of the Panama Canal to a COSCO subsidary, Hutchinson Corporation. According
to the March 29, 1997 Charleston Daily Mail, "Panama peremptorily closed the
bidding, secretly changed the rules, and simply awarded the contract to
Hutchinson before the American or other firms could even know what was
happening." Documents show that at least 3 more lucrative deals offered by U.S.
companies were rejected. Obviously Panama would not have done this without U.S.
urging.
Rep. Traficant complained in Congress that Red China is now going
to manufacture boots for the U.S. Army. On April 1, 1997 the AP said for the
first time since the 1950s Chinese ships can now dock near U.S. military
installations with only a day's notice. And there are plans to bring Chinese
troops to the U.S. for training exercises. Yet currently 450 Chinese businesses
are under federal investigation for espionage, and China continues to be
attacked in the press for illegal campaign contributions to the
Democratic/Republican Party.
COSCO has been attempting, with White House support, to lease the
closed naval facility in Long Beach. Under the agreement U.S. Customs could only
inspect one in 8 COSCO ships so it will be impossible to prevent illegal drugs
and weapons from entering the U.S. Strategic Investments (May, 1997) said the
Chinese military has agreed to distribute opium/heroin for Burma. Last year U.S.
Customs in Oakland seized 2,000 AK-47s delivered on a COSCO ship. According to
federal documents these weapons were going to street gangs in southern
California. Wang Jun chairman of Polytech, the manufacturer of these weapons,
attended a White House function in February, 1996. On April 4, 1997 the AP said
two truckloads of illegal Chinese arms bound for Mexico were found in a San
Diego warehouse. According to the evidence there were four other truckloads of
arms from China.
Why is Red China interested in arming American street gangs with
thousands of weapons. There have been numerous reports that street gangs are
being requited to be used as shock troops by the government during a national
emergency partly to disarm the public and to make arrests. In June, 1996 the
Justice Department said it was going to hold a conference with gang leaders to
discuss common problems. The White House on May 13, 1996 said there were 16,000
gangs with 500,000 members. The San Jose Mercury News last year explained how
the Contras supplied illegal drugs to the Crips and Bloods in L.A., apparently
with CIA knowledge. These two gangs have now spread throughout the country. CIA
involvement in smuggling illegal drugs into the U.S. has been documentated for
decades by numerous sources. As the Nazis did in Germany before they took
control the ruling elite support street gangs so they can be used to terrorize
the people.
In the book Fateful Visions, which is edited by members of the
CFR, various authors say that as a world government is established secession
will not be allowed. Once a consensus has formed to establish a world
government, all nations will have to join it. If some nations refuse to do this,
it supposedly would threaten peace, so force would be used against them. (See
page 211-2) Paul Warburg, a prominent Wall Street CFR leader, testified before
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950. He said: "We shall
have world government whether or not you like it-by conquest or
consent."(Hearings on Revision of the UN Charter, p. 494) In the July/August,
1995 issue of Foreign Affairs (p.8) Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. said: "We are not
going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in
words and money." When influential people openly state these things, reasonable
people have a right to be concerned. In hundreds of books, speeches, and journal
articles influential people call for a one world government, the end of U.S.
sovereignty, and the end of freedoms Americans have long held dear. This
material is discussed in my book Treason: The New World Order. (See below)
Place yourself in the shoes of a corporate traitor planning to
establish an open police state in America. Tens of millions of Americans are
armed and aware that treason is taking place. And there are powerful elements in
the military who will not sit by and support a police state. These corporate
traitors cannot risk an open confrontation and hope for the best. They are well
aware that if they lose they will lose everything so resistance must be met with
force.
The plan is for Red China and many other nations to send large
concentrations of troops to the U.S. As recorded in the Library of Congress, the
invasion of the U.S. by vast armies from Asia, Europe, and Africa with great
devastation resulting is the third great danger to America's survival that
George Washington saw in his vision with an angel at Valley Forge in 1777. (See
http://www.ptialaska.net/~swampy/interest/vision.html)
These armies were immersed in a dark red light. The angel
concluded: "Son of the Republic, what you have seen is thus interpreted: Three
great perils will come upon the Republic. The most fearful is the third, but in
this greatest conflict the whole world united shall not prevail against her. Let
every child of the Republic learn to live for his God, his land and the Union."
Washington had another vision which is less well known. He saw the Chinese
invading the Western U.S. and by Divine intervention they were stopped in the
Rocky Mountains.
The Spotlight April 28, 1997 quoted someone as reporting that
President Carter signed an agreement with Red China to provide 5 million troops
to maintain order in the U.S. if there was a rebellion with the planned takeover
by 2,000. Another source told me Red China will be given land in the Western
states. Recently a BBC documentary was shown in London with Chinese troops
practicing amphibious landings in the Formosa Straits. When BBC newsmen were
allowed to interview some of these soldiers, they asked: "What are you preparing
to use this training for?" The soldiers said: "For the coming invasion of
America!" The scheduled rebroadcast the next day of this documentary was
cancelled.
The Senate passed Amendment 1122 to the 1993 crime bill to bring
Hong Kong police into the U.S. to join our federal police. (Congressional Record
November 5, 1993 S15183. See Section 5108 in this bill.) With Red China now
taking possession of Hong Kong, this law would have provided legal cover to
bring Red Chinese troops into the U.S. This clause was defeated in the joint
House/Senate conference.
On November 30, 1994 NBC Evening News quoted the Pentagon as
saying there were 5,000 foreign troops in the U.S. While there have been many
reports of many foreign troops in the U.S. I have not seen evidence of this.
However, while individual foreign troops have come to the U.S. for military
training for years, today entire units enter the U.S. and the press openly
describes joint military exercises with these soldiers such as in N.C. and Fort
Polk, La. In addition, foreign military equipment including tanks are now stored
at various bases across the U.S. such as in Alamogordo, N.M. and Billings, MT.
The German Air Force now has units at Holloman Air Base, N.M.
(http://www.nebonet.com/headhome/dadmisc/trojan.htm) Also, the
National Guard State Partnership Program was established to exchange American
soldiers in National Guard units with personnel from the former Soviet Union,
supposedly to promote democracy and human rights in these foreign countries.
This is another convenient excuse to send U.S. troopsoverseas and to bring
communist troops here.
While there are over 5,000 foreign troops in the U.S. today, a
greater concern are reports that foreign troops in growing concentrations are
secretly stationed in Canada and Mexico. Col. Ammerman (retired) and others
state that so many Russian troops are in the Mountains of Mexico that there are
food shortages in that country. See
http://feustel.mixi.net/safan/TXT/100/s_129.txt-SAFAN 129 for a discussion of
Russian, Chinese, and German troops in Canada. New rail tracks are being laid in
Canada and reportedly tunnels between Russia and Alaska and Canada have been
built.
Meanwhile the American military has been cut by one-third in
manpower since 1989 with over 200,000 U.S. troops stationed overseas. More cuts
in the military have just been proposed and bases continue to be closed. On May
10, 1994 the Combat Arms Survey was given to 300 marines at the Twenty-nine
Palms Marine Corps base. Questions included "I am a UN fighting person." Many
questions asked if the soldiers would serve under UN command. Question 46 said
if the U.S. gave citizens 30 days to disarm and if Americans refused to
surrender their weapons, "I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government." Other military
personnel have been asked similar questions. Moreover, the military and FEMA
continue to conduct late-night exercises in numerous cities using live
ammunition and low-flying helicopters.
The most likely scenario to occur is that tens of thousands of
foreign troops will be openly brought into the U.S. to patrol the streets. The
most effective way to achieve this is to do it out in the open with the national
press lieing about exactly what was happening. Once entrenched these invaders,
probably supported by street gangs and Gestapo elements of the federal police,
will start seizing guns and arresting patriots. Such an invasion would
radicalize the country unlike any event since the Civil War and widespread
fighting would soon erupt. The NBC Evening News April 16, 1996 said: "5,000
police officers from around the world" will protect the Olympics in Atlanta.
Newsweek June 24, 1996 said "foreign law enforcement agencies" would protect the
Olympics. This event was the first time since the War of 1812 that foreign
troops patrolled a U.S. city. Was this a test case for the future? There was no
need for these troops. The Chicago Tribune, on Sept. 29, 1993 presented an
editorial by Bob Greene describing many problems in the U.S. He said the
U.S.desperately needed a UN multinational force.
Many influential people call for a UN army to promote and maintain
a world government. Books like A World Effectively Controlled By the UN,
Introduction to World Peace Through World Law, and World Peace through World Law
describes these plans in great detail. Aside from local police who will carry
small arms, the entire world is to be disarmed except for a powerful UN army. In
1961 the U.S. State Department issued a publication, Freedom From War, outlining
in detail plans to disarm the U.S. military and establish a UN army. In 1992, UN
Secretary General Boutros Ghali presented An Agenda For Peace calling for a
permanent UN army. The report said: "The time of absoute and exclusive
sovereignty has passed," and it listed reasons that would justify the UN using
its army to intervene in a nation. Senator Boren in the New York Times August
26, 1992, said the world needs a UN army to create a New World Order. On June
27, 1995 the New York Times called for a UN army. Foreign Policy magazine
presented an article (Winter 1992-93, p. 3-21) that actually listed nations to
be taken over by the UN. The use of UN troops in Somalia and Bosnia exemplifies
the coming trend. Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott(CFR) said (Time,
December 14, 1992, p.35) "once a country utter loses its ability to govern
itself, it also loses its claim to sovereignty and should become a ward of the
UN."
If there is an open move to establish a police state four other
events might occur. First, another foreign conflict might be created by the
ruling elite. A war in Korea or the Middle east would be most likely with many
U.S. troops sent overseas. Second, foreign troops in Canada and Mexico would be
greatly increased. Third, phony excuses would be created to have a national
emergency requiring martial law in the U.S. Once again the militias will be
falsely blamed. Many plans exist for FEMA to take control during a national
emergency with the Constitution and Bill of Rights being suspended, as Jack
Anderson noted in October, 1984. Numerous Executive Orders exist that would take
away all our rights. Fourth, with many senior officers supporting the
Consititution, there might be late night raids to arrest and remove hundreds of
officers. There could be an announcement that there was a military coup
threatened by officers with a call backed by the national press to support the
president. Many people would be fooled into this lie just as most German
citizens supported the phony national emergency created by Hitler. While I do
not assume this plan would work, those in the military loyal to the Constitution
have erred in not yet releasing documents such as on the internet showing that
treason is taking place. Educating the public is essential.
I am not saying that an open dictatorship in U.S. will actually
occur in the near future but the threat is clear. The secret government has long
used the gradual approach to take away our rights. Now as their power grows some
in the ruling elite want to shift to blunt force to have an open police state.
Much depends on how unified and loyal the U.S. military remains. Obviously these
foreign countries are not interested in being attacked by nuclear missiles and
the many secret weapons the U.S. military possesses. If military officers loyal
to the Constitution took aggressive actions against the corporate traitors
promoting the New World Order, this would have an important impact.
Because of space limitations many issues discussed above are only
briefly presented here while in Treason The New World Order they are discussed
in great detail. This includes: phony excuses, martial law today, how the elite
create many wars such as WW I and WW II, UN activities, street gangs, Executive
Orders, FEMA activities, people behind the New World Order, and foreign troops
in the U.S.