New World Order
Gun Control and the New World Order
Gun Control and the New World Order
GUN CONTROL AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER
You can check the following item out very quickly at the Library
of Congress, or at any large metropolitan reference library, and I can promise
you that it won't be time wasted!
Ask for a copy of VOLUME 9 of the 1982 EDITION [not the current,
replacement edition] of the U.S. CODE. Turn to page 554, where you'll find the
beginning of PUBLIC LAW # 87-297 [1961]. This law was signed by President
Kennedy in 1962, has received 18 subsequent updates, and its provisions have
been steadily implemented by every President since. It calls for the elimination
of U.S. national forces and further declares that "no one may possess a firearm
or lethal weapon except police or military personnel".
The progressive steps in its implementation are:
the reduction of the U.S. Armed Forces to 2.1 million personnel.
their irrevokable merger with Russian and Chinese forces, in two
stages, to form a World Army [50% of total U.S. force strength will be merged in
the first stage; the remaining 50% in the second stage].
the irrevokable surrender of authority over such forces to the
U.N. Secretary-General [who already has a military planning staff of 80 general
officers].
the confiscation of all privately-held firearms.
This law is taught and explained in the National War College, and
the various U.S. Armed Forces Academies. The New World Order will require an
Army: this is it, and presumably the U.S. itself [and Canada!] could then find
itself policed by foreign troops under the U.N. flag. By agreement, the
commander of this army must always be a Russian! [See below for documentation on
this astonishing fact]
The relevant pages and sections are: page 554; page 555 [lower
right-hand side of page: defines "disarmament" as elimination of U.S. Forces and
calls for absolute restrictions on privately-owned "deadly weapons"]; page 557,
sections [a] and [d] [again, require U.S. to eliminate its Armed Forces]; page
558 deals with "policy formulation" [i.e. the accomplishment of these goals].
George Bush said that the passing of authority to the Secretary-General was "in
transition"; the Supreme Court has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution and
its provisions stand UNDER the U.N. Charter and the Resolutions of the United
Nations. The U.S. Armed Forces are acting as the U.N.'s "world policeman" in the
interim.
The provisions of this law are further explained in STATE
DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION 72-77, which itself is published in unabridged form in
the 35-page "BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE", published by U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND
DISARMAMENT AGENCY [PUBLICATION #4, GENERAL SERIES #3, MAY 1962],. I'm sure you
find this hard to believe, but it's all there in black and white; read it for
yourself! The implications are staggering but the multiple military base
closings around the U.S take on a new perspective when you see the agenda which
that law commits the U.S. government to follow! Another small tip is that new
issues of uniforms [e.g. the new Air Force uniform] reportedly have no "U.S."
insignia. Canadian politicians are operating in lockstep with their U.S.
counterparts on all of these issues, including gun control [UPDATE: a 1995 law
now requires all 7 million rifles, etc., in Canada to be registered by 2003 -
failure to comply will be a serious criminal offense. Many Canadians rightly see
this as the prelude to later wholesale gun confiscation]
Please do go and read these documents for yourself. It's
astonishing, but it's exactly as I've described it to you. The North American
Free Trade Agreement is a small but vital part of something much bigger - first
Continental Union then World Federalism!
Don't be misled by the wording of "Policy Formulation" on page 558
in volume 9, U.S. CODE, 1982. It was re-written in 1963 to pacify objectors, and
forbids removal of firearms from the populace or reduction in national armed
strength "unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President or
authorised by legislation of the Congress"! The U.N Charter is regarded as an
already-binding treaty, so all that is required is a U.N. Resolution or
Congressional legislation to ban all "citizen" armaments. George Bush's father,
Preston, helped push this law [87-297] through Congress. One of the experts on
it is ex-State Senator Bernadine Smith [Box 1776, HANFORD, CALIFORNIA 93232],
who resisted it bitterly, and knows its contents and intent as well as anybody.
Or you could just call the National War College and ask innocently for more
information on it!
Two interesting footnotes on PUBLIC LAW 87-297 [1961]:
200 members of the Trilateral Commission had a late-March, 1993,
meeting over several days in Washington, at which they discussed and agreed on
the need for [guess what?] a New World Army and for U.N. sovereign control of
individual states' immigration policies and decisions. On the evening of the
28th of March, their representatives dined with key U.S. government officials
and presented these "recommendations", and then did the same thing over
breakfast the next morning with Clinton. So here it comes! This will lead
ultimately to an enormous concentration of power in very few hands.
the BATF, as the "compliance and enforcement" arm of the Treasury
Department [which has a CFR man heading it], has been unlawfully "compelling"
gunshop owners across the U.S. to provide the names, addresses and zip codes of
all "long gun" [rifle and shotgun] purchasers, when no legal requirement exists
for this. They are apparently creating a computerised registry of ALL private
weapons across the United States, by locality, street and house. Remember the
confiscation rquirement for all weapons embodied in "A BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE
RACE" and in STATE DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION # 72-77?
This law is still in the current edition of the U.S. Code,
although the page numbers have been changed. You can find it fairly easily by
checking the index to the U.S. Code.
THE NEW WORLD ARMY MUST ALWAYS BE HEADED BY A RUSSIAN
When Alger Hiss [later accused of being a Soviet spy and and
convicted and imprisoned for perjury] set up the United Nations. with his U.S.
State Department colleagues, they established the U.N. DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL
AND SECURITY AFFAIRS, which would have jurisdiction over ALL future U.N.
military operations. Written into the fine print of the rules and regulations
which govern the U.N. is the rule that the head of his U.N. department will
always be a Soviet citizen, military officer, or person designated by the
Soviets. This has been the case for the past 47 years, with the following 14
communist having chaired that vital U.N. post since 1946:
1944-49 Arkady Sobolev All were Soviet citizens. If you think that "Communism is dead",
you're in for a rude awakening! The names and faces have changed - not the
politicians, parties, military hierarchies OR the vast Russian expenditures on
military weaponry and material. And if you think that the "U.N. ARMY" will be
benign, you'll quickly reconsider when foreign U.N. troops under, ultimately,
Russian command are drafted into your neighbourhood to suppress dissent or
"restore order" under the New World Order! They'll be armed, and YOU won't.
So you think that this is fanciful? Read this UPI news item, which
appeared on 09/08/93.....
RUSSIAN-AMERICAN DEFENCE AGREEMENT CALLS FOR JOINT MANEUVERS
WASHINGTON: The United States and Russia signed an agreement
Wednesday on military cooperation that provides for joint military maneuvers by
the two former Cold War foes.
The Russian Defense Minister, General of the Army Pavel Grachev,
who is visiting Washington, signed the memorandum of understanding with Defense
Secretary Les Aspin at a Pentagon ceremony.
The agreement calls for the two sides to hold joint maneuvers that
practice peacekeeping techniques.
The agreement also calls for annual meetings between Grachev and
Aspin and their successors, exchanges between the chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff and his Russian counterpart and a bilateral defense working group to
formulate projects of Russian-American defense.
"This ceremony demonstrates again that the relationship between
our two countries is undergoing historic transformation," Aspin said.
"As President Clinton and President Yeltsin said at their
Vancouver summit meeting," he said, "we are establishing a strategic
partnership," Aspin said. "It is a partnership in which military and defense
relations play a leading role."
"Russia places its highest priority on its cooperation with the
United States," Grachev said, "We promise to do all in our power...to realize
this agreement."
The Russian-American ground maneuvers will train the two sides in
peacekeeping techniques. The first units to participate will be the U.S. 3rd
Mechanized Infantry Division and the Russian 27th Motorized Rifle.
Both division commanders, U.S. Maj. Gen. Leonard Holder, Jr. and
Russian Maj. Gen. Anatoliy Sidyakin, were on hand for the Pentagon ceremony.
"Our two commanders, right after the signing of this agreement,
will sit down at a table and start working out a whole series of steps to make
this all happen," Grachev said.
Both Grachev and Aspin said they wanted to establish a "hotline"
between their respective defense establishments although provision for that was
not actually in the agreement they signed.
In addition to joint peacekeeping exercises, the memorandum calls
for annual meetings between Aspin and Grachev and their successors, exchanges
between the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian
counterpart and a bilateral working group to think up more projects for
Russian-American military cooperation.
No date or place for the first joint Russian-American ground
maneuver has yet been set.
Pressed on whether the exercise would be held this year, Grachev
noted that the planning time needed for maneuvers of so large a scale would mean
that if so, it would probably have to start during the [unclear]
"The 3rd Division commander," he joked, "said if it's OK with
them, we can go to Siberia and hold them there."
One of the best, most detailed and readable books you can find on
the topic of the New World Order is TOWARD A NEW WORLD ORDER, by Don McAlvany
[see our THE NEW WORLD ORDER INTELLIGENCE UPDATE, which dealt with the elite
COMMISSION FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE's 1995 Report "OUR GLOBAL NEIGHBOURHOOD", shows
you what's coming - fast! A 1998 U.N.-sponsored World Conference On Global
Governance is scheduled to review these "recommendations" and fully implement
them world-wide by the year 2000!
"But it gets worse still; OUR GLOBAL NEIGHBOURHOOD smoothly
presents this revolutionary principle:
"The sovereignty and territorial inviolability of nation states
have been bedrock tenets of the world system. States have valued these as
fundamental to the protection of their independence and legitimacy. Small and
less powerful states in particular have seen in these principles their main
defense against more powerful predatory countries, and they have looked to the
world community to uphold these norms.
In an increasingly interdependent world in which old notions of
territoriality, independence and intervention have lost some of their meaning,
these traditional principles need to be adapted. Nations are having to accept
that in certain fields, sovereignty has to be exercised collectively,
particularly in relation to the global commons. The principle of sovereignty
must be adapted in such a way as to balance the rights of states with the rights
of people, and the interests of nations with the interests of the global
neighbourhood."
Are you beginning to see the pattern here? "Governments - you
don't have any control over anything significant now, so just go huddle with
your citizens and share the "governance". States - before if someone invaded
you, you could expect the world community to come to your rescue; but, now, if
you try to back out of our new globalist system or stray out of line, it'll be
the world community itself that will be doing the invading. And, states, just so
that you're increasingly weakened to the point of non-resistance, we'll be
busily telling your citizens that people are more important than states and
referring to you as mere "nations". Oh, and welcome to the neighbourhood!"
Combined with its recommendations for global disarmament - except
for the U.N., that is, which will retain an impressive, loyal and heavily-armed
"Rapid Reaction Force" [aka "the New World Army"] which will leave states
militarily helpless in the face of international aggression under the guise of
"policing" - we find this reassuring recommendation:
"We must strive to ensure that the global neighbourhood of the
future is characterized by law not lawlessness; by rules which all must
respect...that none, even the most powerful, is above the law.
The absence of an international criminal court discredits the
law...we would like to see an international criminal court instituted as a
matter of the highest priority.
The enforcement powers of the international legal system must also
be strengthened. The need for an efficient monitoring and compliance regime has
become apparent over the years. One way forward is to make international law
enforceable in domestic courts. In our global neighbourhood we must live by a
new ethic that is underpinned by a culture of law."
"Failing voluntary compliance, Security Council enforcement of
World Court decisions and other international legal obligations should be
pursued."
And there will be no opting out, for:
"In an ideal world, acceptance of the compulsory jurisdiction of
the World Court would be a prerequisite for U.N. membership."
And if you are a dissident or a resister of any sort - an "outlaw"
in our new Global Neighbourhood - remember that "You can run, but you can't
hide. In the coming Fourth Reich, we will busily monitoring and enforcing
compliance everywhere!"
You won't have to wait long for this collectivist paradise,
either: "Our recommendation is that the General Assembly should agree to hold a
World Conference on Governance in 1998, with its decisions to be ratified and
put into effect by 2000."
And who'll be paying for all of this? Why YOU will, of course - as
we said, there's no free lunch in this nice new neighbourhood, just a whole
bunch of heavily-enforced new responsibilities in exchange for a meagre handful
of rights:
"A start must be made in establishing schemes of global financing
of global purposes, including charges for the use of global resources such as
flight lanes, sea lanes and ocean fishing areas and the collection of global
revenues agreed globally and implemented by treaty.
An international tax on foreign currency transactions should be
explored as one option, as should the creation of an international corporate tax
base among multinational companies. It is time for the evolution of a consensus
on the concept of global taxation for servicing the needs of the global
neigbourhood."
Doesn't that make it sound wonderfully warm and folksy? As though
you'll just be paying the U.N. to pick up your garbage each week? Well, don't
forget that water and air are "global resources", as is living space; right now
you get them for free, or almost for free. But get ready for the day when you
pay a tax to grow carrots in your own back garden - that soil is a "global
resource"; it belongs to the globe, not to you! It's the nature of taxes to both
grow and creep, even as they level and impoverish. If you think that your living
standard has declined now, wait until these new taxes hit your pocketbook.
You'll be paying rent, via a plethora of all-encompassing global taxes, just to
live on the face of the earth.
"But," you may be thinking, "if things get really bad there'll be
a revolution. We can always fight back and reassert our freedom!" Well, think
again, and then forget about it fast, before you become a candidate for future
elimination. They've thought of that, too, and here's their recommendation:
"An emphasis on the security of people requires the world to
address the culture of violence in everyday life, which is a major source of
insecurity today for people everywhere around the globe. The culture of violence
- as vivid in daily life, particularly against women and children, as it is on
the television screens - infects industrial and developing countries, and rich
and poor alike, even if in different ways. Every effort must be made on the
local and community level, as well as at the international level, to reverse
this trend and sow the seeds of a culture of non-violence.
We strongly endorse community initiatives to protect individual
life, to encourage the disarming of civilians, and to foster an atmosphere of
security in neighbourhoods."
Nor, particularly in the U.S., if these globalist pundits have
their way, will there be any access to easily-concealable small arms even before
the total disarming of the world's population is accomplished. They cite, under
the heading THE IMPACT OF SMALL ARMS, this extract from John Keegan's A HISTORY
OF WARFARE:
"[Those] who have died in war since [9 August 1945] have, for the
most part, been killed by cheap, mass-produced weapons, costing little more than
the transistor radios and dry-cell batteries which have flooded the world in the
same period. Because cheap weapons have disrupted life very little in the
advanced world, outside the restricted areas where drug-dealing and political
terrorism flourish, the populations of the rich states have been slow to
recognize the horror that this pollution has brought in its train. Little by
little, though, recognition of the horror is gaining ground."
You can be pretty sure that national police and the U.N.'s own
army will not be affected by any "anti-pollution legislation" or U.N. treaties
passed to correct this environmental blight, however - just the workers in the
new global plantation, who might just take it into their minds someday to engage
in random acts of resistance or to rise up en masse. Just, that is, us."
(c)New World Order Intelligence Update
[Web site: http://www.inforamp.net/~jwhitley]
